🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.